court

My lawyer tells me that the closing argument is one of the most important parts of a jury trial. Why is that?

The closing argument, also called the summation, is very important because it lets your lawyer put the case together to the jury from the eyes of the defense. Remember the judge gives a speech last. The order of the speeches is defense, prosecution, judge. When the judge speaks last, the attorneys know what the judge is going to say in advance, so if you want to argue any points about the judges speech, you are permitted to make that argument during the closing as well. Trial advocacy is an art, its not a question with an answer. Trial advocacy is a craft the attorney works on their entire career.

The main reason why the closing is so important is because the prosecution has the burden of proof, there are many jury trials where the attorney does not put on any evidence and hardly asks any questions during the case. Further, in the opening statement, the attorney is not allowed to make an argument, just a statement about the facts and the evidence, so the closing in some cases is the first and only time that you can make a real argument about how you see the case.

A good example of this is a date rape case. For this example, the woman tells a friend a month after the incident that her ex-boyfriend came over for dinner and raped her after dinner. There is no other evidence except the testimony of the alleged victim. The criminal defense attorney in that case in their opening statement will say there is no proof his client was ever present for dinner on the night in question, no DNA evidence, no prompt complaint, no medical evidence, and no pictures of injuries to the alleged victim. The defense attorney may ask no questions during the entire case and not call anyone tot he stand. The closing argument will be the only time where the attorney can argue that the alleged victim is a liar, that she made up the whole story because she is angry with the defendant for breaking up with her, etc. The closing argument can be the most important part of your case.

With over 25 years of experience, Brian J. Zeiger draws on his knowledge and insight in criminal defense and civil rights to help those confronting an unjust criminal justice system. Mr. Zeiger has represented clients facing serious charges in state and federal courts. He has also represented clients in civil rights claims against police departments and the government in cases involving police misconduct, police brutality, false arrest, malicious prosecution, prison misconduct, prison denial of medical care, and prison medical malpractice. Expertise.com recognized Mr. Zeiger as one of the Best DUI Lawyers in Philadelphia in 2022. He is a highly sought-after criminal defense attorney who has been asked to provide training to fellow lawyers on topics such as trial advocacy, post-conviction relief, and driving-under-the-influence laws. He also served as a Hearing Officer for The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

With over 25 years of experience, Brian J. Zeiger puts his knowledge and insight in criminal defense and to help those confronting an unjust criminal judicial system.

Education: B.S.B.A. Accounting & Finance from Washington University of St. Louis, M.B.A. from Temple University, and J.D. from Temple University School of Law

Awards: Super Lawyer in the areas of Criminal Defense, White Collar, and Civil Rights, America’s Top 100 Criminal Defense Attorneys Recipient Award, National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Top 40 Under 40, Client Satisfaction Award and 10 Best Attorneys by the American Institute of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Attorney and Practice Magazine’s Top 10 Criminal Defense Attorney – Philadelphia, and National Association of Distinguished Counsel – Nation’s Top 1% – Criminal Defense

Admissions: Supreme Court of New Jersey, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, United States District Court for the Western District of New York United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Supreme Court of the United States