Malicious Prosecution

I was falsely arrested in a criminal case. I was not injured during the arrest. However, I was on probation at the time, so the new arrest caused me to have a detainer. I was found not guilty in the criminal case. I spent approximately a year in jail. Do I have a police brutality or civil rights case? You do. The name of your claim is malicious prosecution.

You can file a malicious prosecution claim in both federal and state court. You must have a prevailing outcome in the criminal case. This means you must be found not guilty or have the case dismissed in order to file the claim. The arrest must be based on the actions of a police officer, not based on a civilian complainant. You may still have a case under the law if it is a civilian complainant, but it won’t be worth much.

These are very good cases when the Plaintiff is found not guilty and it is a police case. For example, a drug case (PWID), possession of a firearm (VUFA), and assault on an officer are all good malicious prosecution civil rights cases.

Computing damages in a malicious prosecution case where there are no other claims (meaning no police brutality) is generally based on days in custody. The more time the bad arrest (malicious prosecution) kept the person in jail, the more the case is worth. If the plaintiff had a detainer caused by the false arrest in the case, the damages are slightly less than if the person was simply being held on bail. The reason for this is that while the arrest caused the detainer to lodge, there could not have been a detainer but a completely different case of which the officers were not part. However, my answer would change if it was the actual probation officer who put the new false arrest on the plaintiff.

With over 25 years of experience, Brian J. Zeiger draws on his knowledge and insight in criminal defense and civil rights to help those confronting an unjust criminal justice system. Mr. Zeiger has represented clients facing serious charges in state and federal courts. He has also represented clients in civil rights claims against police departments and the government in cases involving police misconduct, police brutality, false arrest, malicious prosecution, prison misconduct, prison denial of medical care, and prison medical malpractice. Expertise.com recognized Mr. Zeiger as one of the Best DUI Lawyers in Philadelphia in 2022. He is a highly sought-after criminal defense attorney who has been asked to provide training to fellow lawyers on topics such as trial advocacy, post-conviction relief, and driving-under-the-influence laws. He also served as a Hearing Officer for The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

With over 25 years of experience, Brian J. Zeiger puts his knowledge and insight in criminal defense and to help those confronting an unjust criminal judicial system.

Education: B.S.B.A. Accounting & Finance from Washington University of St. Louis, M.B.A. from Temple University, and J.D. from Temple University School of Law

Awards: Super Lawyer in the areas of Criminal Defense, White Collar, and Civil Rights, America’s Top 100 Criminal Defense Attorneys Recipient Award, National Trial Lawyers Top 100 Trial Lawyers and Top 40 Under 40, Client Satisfaction Award and 10 Best Attorneys by the American Institute of Criminal Defense Attorneys, Attorney and Practice Magazine’s Top 10 Criminal Defense Attorney – Philadelphia, and National Association of Distinguished Counsel – Nation’s Top 1% – Criminal Defense

Admissions: Supreme Court of New Jersey, United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, United States District Court for the Western District of New York United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, Supreme Court of the United States